How does line of business and linetype prediction work?
How does the claim combination logic work in loss run files?
How does Groundspeed detect duplicate loss run claims?
How does Groundspeed detect duplicate loss run summary records?
How does Groundspeed identify loss run claim occurrences?
What insurance documents does Groundspeed support?
What documents doesn't Groundspeed support?
Why do some files fail to ingest?
What ACORD forms doesn't Groundspeed support?
I sent a ZIP file and then later sent another, but they're not coming back under the same account?
How is data populated in extracts for fields that can be drawn from multiple documents?
For claims, Groundspeed populates two related fields in the loss detail output to describe the relevant class of insurance business and coverage: line of business and linetype.
Line of business describes the class of insurance business the claim pertains to, and can include umbrella, package, or excess lines.
Linetype describes the underlying coverage type relevant to the claim, and does not include umbrella, package, or excess classifications.
In practice, these fields will always be the same unless the LOB is umbrella, package, or excess. In which case, the linetype will specify the underlying coverage type relevant to the claim.
The Groundspeed pipeline uses capture values, heuristics, and machine learning models to identify the line of business and linetype for a given claim in the following order:
The Groundspeed claim combination logic combines individual claim records that belong to one accident but were split in the source document.
To enable combination the logic performs two steps: identification of claims to merge and combining the data from the claim records.
The Groundspeed claim detail duplication detection logic works to identify individual claim records that are duplicates.
All fields must match in the record to detect a duplicate:
The Groundspeed claim summary duplication detection logic works to identify claim summary records that are duplicates.
The Groundspeed claim occurrence identification logic aims to identify a singular occurrence from which claims originated.
Examples include an auto accident, a hail storm, or an explosion at a factory which resulted in multiple claims.
Product Type | Support Document Type |
---|---|
Setup and Clearance/Submission |
ACORD Forms |
Loss Runs |
Excel/CSV loss report |
Exposures |
Schedule of Hazards Driver List Vehicle Schedule Payroll Schedule Location Schedule Revenue Schedule Aircraft Schedule NCCI Emod CA WCRIB Emod ACORD Forms |
Emod |
CA WCRIB Emod |
Note: All versions and variants of each form will be supported. This includes state-specific variants, old form versions, and ACORD forms generated from an agency management system. For example: "Applied 130API," "INS 127," and "137 TX."
Form Number | Notes |
---|---|
27 | |
45 | |
101 | |
125 | Including: "ANI" and "CIS" supplements |
126 | |
127 | |
129 | |
130 | Including: "ANI" supplement |
131 | |
137 | Including: State-specific variants, ex. "137 FL" |
139 | Including: CISGEM C540 SOV supplement |
140 | |
141 | |
143 | |
146 | |
147 | |
148 | |
152 | |
160 | Including: "ANI" supplement |
163 | |
211 | |
810 | |
823 | |
98 | |
OFCLADCOV | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFGARVEH | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFSOICOV | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFAPPINF | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFREMARK | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFCONINF | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFAPPINFCNI | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFBAADCV | Additional Endorsement/Supplement |
OFSUPPNAME | Supplemental names of other named insureds |
APDWCLOC | Applied WC form associated with the ACORD 130 |
OFWCRATE | AMS WC form associated with the ACORD 130 |
Out-Of-Scope Type | Description | Examples |
---|---|---|
Unsupported Document | File extensions or file types that are not machine-readable, OR are not relevant to commercial insurance. These documents will likely never be on our product roadmap |
TXT Signature Block Images Audio, Video files Executables, scripts Password protected Low Image Quality No data - empty files Incorrect MIME/Content type Files with handwriting Files that do not pass virus scanning checks Company Brochure White Paper Marketing Materials Any Personal Lines Submission |
Error Code | Error | Description |
---|---|---|
100 | unsupported_file_type | The archive file type sent to our intake process was not on the list of supported file types |
101 | failed_virus_scan | The file, or the file container sent failed the virus scan step, and was quarantined |
102 | bad_zip_file | The file extension was a zip, however the file itself could not be opened |
106 | unsupported_document_type | No files within the zip are supported |
This list only covers commercial lines ACORD forms that we consider out-of-scope. All personal lines ACORD forms are out-of-scope at the moment.
Groundspeed uses doctype precedence to determine which document a field is pulled from. If that field is not present in any of the doctypes listed then that field will appear blank on the extract.
Example: “insuredName” in the submissionData section of standard submission extracts.
insuredName has a doctype preference order of slip, email, acord, policyform, brokerspec, exposuredoc, sov, application, and locationschedule.
Scenario: An insured name of “Acme Corp Inc.” is found on a slip doctype and an insured name of “Acme Corp” is found on a brokerspec in the same submission. Because the slip doctype precedes the brokerspec in the doctype precedence rules set for this field, the insured name presented on the extract would be “Acme Corp Inc.”